Which situation is most likely to occur due to the high call volume in urban areas for EMDs?

The scenario involving high call volume in urban areas typically leads to delays in responding to non-urgent calls. In such environments, emergency medical dispatchers are often inundated with numerous requests for assistance, which can strain resources and prioritization efforts.

As EMDs are tasked with triaging calls based on urgency, non-urgent situations may experience longer wait times due to the pressing nature of life-threatening emergencies that demand immediate attention. This means that while critical calls are prioritized to ensure rapid response, those deemed less urgent may be left waiting longer for assistance.

The other potential outcomes, such as shorter wait times for dispatchers or increased availability of ambulances, do not realistically align with the challenges posed by high call volumes. Moreover, the notion that fewer emergency situations occur is inaccurate; high call volumes reflect the opposite, indicating a busy and potentially overwhelmed dispatch system. Thus, the likelihood of delayed responses to non-urgent calls accurately captures the impact of urban call volume on emergency medical services.